home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
070891
/
0708471.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
3KB
|
66 lines
<text id=91TT1516>
<title>
July 08, 1991: No Deficit Of Laughs
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
July 08, 1991 Who Are We?
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
BOOKS, Page 59
No Deficit Of Laughs
</hdr><body>
<qt>
<l>Parliament Of Whores</l>
<l>By P.J. O'Rourke</l>
<l>Atlantic Monthly Press; 233 pages; $19.95</l>
</qt>
<p> Forget everything you ever learned about the U.S.
government. You can toss it all--the separation of powers, the
electoral college and even the pocket veto--into the trash
can. Then pick up P.J. O'Rourke's Parliament of Whores, a
riotously funny and perceptive indictment of America's political
system. You'll stop reading only when you stop laughing.
</p>
<p> O'Rourke, one of America's funniest writers and potentate
of gonzo journalism, tried to find how the U.S. government
works. His not-so-startling conclusion: it doesn't. Yet
O'Rourke, an unabashed conservative with libertarian leanings,
tells you why government is a flop in a way no civics textbook
ever could. "I'm not sure I learned anything," he writes,
"except that giving money and power to government is like giving
whiskey and car keys to teenage boys."
</p>
<p> The author adheres to several tenets. First among them,
government is boring. Why? "The last person left awake gets to
spend all the tax money," he writes. And government is morally
wrong. "If enough people get together and act in concert,"
argues O'Rourke, "they can take something and not pay for it."
</p>
<p> His scathing critique of U.S. agricultural policy should
be required reading for every presidential candidate. O'Rourke
may be the first writer to explain the savings and loan fiasco
in a manner that keeps you from falling asleep after the first
mention of subordinated debt. He also reveals, in terms a
mathematical dunce can fathom, the Social Security system's
purpose: it's the best way for voting everyone rich.
</p>
<p> There are some flaws. Rolling Stone magazine's premier
essayist has spliced together discrete essays, making the book
more a collection of pieces than a unified whole. At times he
grows as shrill as those he skewers. Nonetheless, O'Rourke
manages to ask all the explosive questions--Why are taxes so
high? Why doesn't government work? How did things get so bad?--that tap into the deep vein of discontent running through
America today. Parliament of Whores may not spark a revolution,
but it is one of the few books on civic affairs worth reading
from cover to cover.
</p>
<p> By Michael Riley
</p>
</body></article>
</text>